This quiz works best with JavaScript enabled.
Home
>
English Grammar
>
Grammar
>
Parts Of Speech
>
Verbs
>
Moods
>
Unreal Conditionals β Quiz 1
Unreal Conditionals Quiz 1 (30 MCQs)
This multiple-choice question set evaluates the understanding of past unreal conditionals, including their structure and usage in hypothetical scenarios. It also assesses the ability to recognize appropriate vocabulary for expressing perceptions of value and identifying conditional clauses in English grammar.
Quiz Instructions
Select an option to see the correct answer instantly.
1.
Which words CANNOT go in the space?We ..... have won the game if we'd played a little better.
A) Might.
B) Would.
C) Can.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Unreal conditionals express hypothetical situations that are not real and cannot happen. In such cases, we use modal verbs like "would," "could," or "might" to indicate these unreal conditions. The word "can" is used for present abilities and does not fit the context of an unreal conditional sentence.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Might - Correct in unreal conditionals, but not the answer here.
Option B:
Would - Correct in unreal conditionals.
Option C:
Can - Incorrect for this context; "can" is used for real abilities and does not fit an unreal conditional sentence.
Option D:
None of the above - Incorrect, as option C can be excluded.
2.
If she (speak) French, she (communicate) better.
A) If she speaks French, she will communicate better.
B) If she speaks French, she communicated better.
C) If she spoke French, she will communicate better.
D) If she speak French, she communicate better.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option A is correct because it uses the present tense "speaks" and "will communicate," which are appropriate for an unreal conditional sentence expressing a hypothetical situation in the present that cannot come true.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. Uses present tense for the condition and future tense for the result.
Option B:
Incorrect. Uses past tense "spoke" which is not appropriate for an unreal conditional in the present.
Option C:
Incorrect. Uses past tense "spoke" and future tense "will communicate," which mixes tenses incorrectly.
Option D:
Incorrect. Uses base form "speak" and "communicate," which does not match the required conditional structure.
3.
If I were rich, I would buy a house.The if clause is in the .....
A) Simple past.
B) Simple present.
C) All the above.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The if clause "If I were rich" is in the simple past tense, which is used to express hypothetical situations that are contrary to fact and not currently true. This structure is characteristic of Type 2 Unreal Conditionals.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. The if clause uses the simple past tense "were" to indicate a hypothetical situation.
Option B:
Incorrect. The simple present tense would be used in Type 1 Unreal Conditionals, e.g., "If I am rich, I will buy a house."
Option C:
Incorrect. This option suggests all the above, but only Option A is correct for this specific if clause.
Option D:
Incorrect. The given if clause does fit into one of the provided options.
4.
His car ..... be a lot safer if he ..... (buy) some new tires.
A) Was be/ would buy.
B) Is/ would bought.
C) Would/bought.
D) Would/ buys.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence describes a situation that is not real or possible, which fits the structure of an unreal conditional. In such cases, the
if-clause
uses the past tense (
would buy
) and the main clause uses "would + base verb" (
would be
). Therefore, option C) "Would/bought" is correct.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect. Uses present tense in both clauses.
Option B:
Incorrect. Uses present tense in the main clause and past participle in the
if-clause
.
Option C:
Correct. Uses "would" for the
if-clause
and "would be" for the main clause.
Option D:
Incorrect. Uses present tense in the main clause and past simple in the
if-clause
.
5.
If I were taller, I ..... basketball with you.
A) Had played.
B) Will play.
C) Would play.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
In this sentence, we are dealing with an unreal conditional, which expresses a hypothetical situation that is not true and cannot happen. The structure for such a condition in the past tense is "If + subject + had + past participle, subject + would + base form of verb." Here, "If I were taller" indicates a hypothetical state, and "I would play basketball with you" correctly uses the conditional "would" to express what would happen if the condition were true.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect. "Had played" is in the past perfect tense and does not fit the structure of an unreal conditional.
Option B:
Incorrect. "Will play" uses the future tense, which is inappropriate for expressing a hypothetical situation in the past.
Option C:
Correct. "Would play" properly forms the unreal conditional to express what would happen if the condition were true.
Option D:
Incorrect. There is a correct answer among the options provided.
6.
If I ..... more practice problems in high school, I would have felt more confident in calculus.
A) Did.
B) Would do.
C) Had done.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence describes a past unreal conditional situation, where the speaker is expressing that if they had practiced more problems in high school, their current confidence would have been higher. The correct form for this type of condition is "had + past participle," which matches Option C ("Had done").
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Did - Incorrect as it does not use the past perfect tense required for unreal conditions in the past.
Option B:
Would do - Incorrect as it is used for present or future unreal conditions, not past ones.
Option C:
Had done - Correct form for a past unreal conditional.
Option D:
None of the above - Incorrect as Option C is correct.
7.
If I ..... more time, I would take up a new hobby.
A) Will have.
B) Have.
C) Had.
D) Would have.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence "If I
Had
more time, I would take up a new hobby." is an example of a second conditional in the past tense, which is used to talk about hypothetical situations that are contrary to fact or impossible. The correct form uses "had" for the past simple and "would" for the modal verb.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect. Uses future tense ("will have"), which does not fit the context of a hypothetical situation in the past.
Option B:
Incorrect. Uses present simple ("have"), which is also for real situations, not hypothetical ones.
Option C:
Correct. Uses "had" to indicate the past condition and "would" for the modal verb, fitting the structure of a second conditional.
Option D:
Incorrect. Uses past perfect ("would have"), which is used in third conditionals, not second.
8.
If you ..... him, he ..... so much.
A) Called, wouldn't worry.
B) Had called, wouldn't have worried.
C) All the above.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option B is correct because it uses the past perfect tense ("Had called") to express a hypothetical situation in the past, and "wouldn't have worried" indicates what would not have happened as a result of that action. This aligns with the structure of an unreal conditional sentence.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Uses simple past tense which is incorrect for expressing a hypothetical situation in the past.
Option B:
Correct use of past perfect and would have + past participle to express an unreal condition and its result.
Option C:
Incorrect as it includes "All the above," which is not applicable since only one option is correct.
Option D:
Indicates no correct answer, which contradicts the fact that Option B is indeed correct.
9.
If he'd enjoyed working here he ..... for another company now.
A) Didn't work.
B) Wouldn't be working.
C) Wouldn't have worked.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence "If he'd enjoyed working here he ... for another company now." is an example of a second conditional, which talks about a situation that is contrary to fact in the present. The correct form should express a result that would be different from reality if the condition were true.
Option B) "Wouldn't be working" correctly uses the structure "would not + base form of verb" to indicate what would happen if the past perfect condition ("he'd enjoyed") were true.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect. It suggests a simple past tense, which is not appropriate for second conditional.
Option B:
Correct. Uses "wouldn't be working" to express the result of the condition being true.
Option C:
Incorrect. The use of "would have worked" implies a past action, which is not suitable for this sentence structure.
Option D:
Incorrect. At least one option (B) is correct.
10.
If I were you, I ..... in that river as there might be crocodiles.
A) Woudn't swim.
B) Had never swim.
C) Didn't swim.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Unreal conditionals express hypothetical situations that are contrary to fact and are not possible in the present or future. The correct form for a Type 2 Unreal Conditional is "would + base verb" (e.g., wouldn't swim). Option A, "Woudn't swim," correctly uses this structure.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. Uses the proper type 2 unreal conditional form.
Option B:
Incorrect. Past perfect tense is not used in Type 2 Unreal Conditionals.
Option C:
Incorrect. Simple past tense is not used in Type 2 Unreal Conditionals.
Option D:
Incorrect. At least one option is correct, so "none of the above" is incorrect.
11.
We can use the present continuous in the if clause, WILL-in the main clauseIf it's raining tomorrow, we will not go to the festival.
A) 3 CONDITIONAL.
B) 1 CONDITIONAL.
C) 0 CONDITIONAL.
D) 2 CONDITIONAL.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence "If it's raining tomorrow, we will not go to the festival" is an example of a first conditional (or present continuous with future in the main clause). However, since the question specifically asks about unreal conditionals and the given sentence describes a real possibility rather than an unreal situation, this does not fit into the category of unreal conditionals. Therefore, the correct answer is C) 0 CONDITIONAL.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect as it suggests there are three conditionals in the sentence.
Option B:
Incorrect as it claims one conditional when none fits unreal conditionals.
Option C:
Correct because no unreal conditionals are present; the sentence describes a real possibility.
Option D:
Incorrect as it suggests there are two conditionals in the sentence.
12.
If we ..... more free time, we would learn a new skill.
A) Would have.
B) Has.
C) Had.
D) Have.
Show Answer
Explanations:
In unreal conditionals, the past perfect tense (had + past participle) is used to express a hypothetical situation in the past that did not happen. Since the sentence implies learning a new skill if there was more free time in the past, "Had" correctly forms the conditional clause.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Would have - Incorrect for this context as it suggests a present or future hypothetical situation.
Option B:
Has - Incorrect tense and form for unreal conditionals in the past.
Option C:
Had - Correct, forms the conditional clause indicating a past hypothetical situation.
Option D:
Have - Incorrect for this context as it suggests a present or future hypothetical situation.
13.
If you ..... the formula correctly, you would have reached the right result.
A) Apply.
B) Applied.
C) Had applied.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence describes a hypothetical situation in the past where applying the formula correctly would have led to the right result. This is an example of a second conditional, which uses "had + past participle" for the condition clause when talking about unreal or impossible situations in the past. Therefore, "Had applied" (Option C) is correct.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect - Present tense does not fit the context of a past unreal situation.
Option B:
Incorrect - Past tense does not fit the context of an unreal or impossible situation in the past.
Option C:
Correct - Uses "had + past participle" for second conditional, indicating an unreal or impossible situation in the past.
Option D:
Incorrect - There is a correct answer among the options provided.
14.
We are very ..... to all those who contributed economically to keep the school open.
A) Relieved.
B) Delighted.
C) Overwhelmed.
D) Grateful.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The correct answer is
D) Grateful.
The phrase "We are very grateful to all those who contributed economically to keep the school open" indicates a sense of thankfulness and appreciation for the contributions made by others. This aligns with the meaning conveyed in the sentence.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Relieved - implies a feeling of being freed from worry or difficulty, which does not fit the context.
Option B:
Delighted - means very pleased or happy, but it is too strong for this context where gratitude is more appropriate.
Option C:
Overwhelmed - suggests feeling confused and unable to cope with a situation, which does not match the tone of appreciation in the sentence.
Option D:
Grateful - accurately conveys the sense of thankfulness for the contributions made by others.
15.
If she ..... (study) harder, she ..... (get) better grades.
A) Had studied-would have gotten.
B) Had studied-would have got.
C) Had study-would have gotten.
D) Had study-would have got.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Unreal conditionals express hypothetical situations that are not real and cannot happen. The correct form for the past perfect in unreal conditionals is "had + past participle." In this sentence, "studied" should be conjugated as "had studied," and "get" should be "gotten."
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. Uses "had studied" for the past perfect and "would have gotten" for the modal + past participle in unreal conditionals.
Option B:
Incorrect. "Would have got" is grammatically correct but "studied" should be "had studied."
Option C:
Incorrect. "Had study" is not a proper verb form; it should be "had studied." Additionally, "would have gotten" is correct.
Option D:
Incorrect. "Would have got" is grammatically correct but "studied" should be "had studied."
16.
Something that people feel cost more than it should is a .....
A) Decoy.
B) Distraction.
C) Rip off.
D) Refreshment stand.
Show Answer
Explanations:
A "rip off" is a term used to describe something that people feel has been overpriced, meaning they believe the cost is more than it should be for the quality or value received.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Decoy - This term refers to an option designed to distract from another choice but does not describe something overpriced.
Option B:
Distraction - Similar to "decoy," this term is about diverting attention and is unrelated to pricing perceptions.
Option C:
Rip off - Correct. This term accurately describes the feeling that a product or service has been overpriced.
Option D:
Refreshment stand - A place selling drinks and snacks, not related to pricing perception terms.
17.
If you (love) her very much, you (leave, negative) her.
A) Loved / would not leave.
B) Love / will not leave.
C) Loved / would leave not.
D) Don't love / leave.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Unreal conditionals express hypothetical situations that are contrary to fact and do not have a real possibility of happening. In this sentence, the structure is "If + past perfect (Loved), would + base form negative (not leave)." This matches Option A.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. Uses past perfect in the condition and would not in the result.
Option B:
Incorrect. Present tense "Love" does not fit unreal conditional structure.
Option C:
Incorrect. Past perfect used but "would leave not" is awkward; should be "would not leave."
Option D:
Incorrect. Negative in condition but positive result ("leave").
18.
We wouldn't have come to Bangkok if we ..... it was the monsoon season.
A) Knew.
B) Had known.
C) All the above.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence "We wouldn't have come to Bangkok if we had known it was the monsoon season" is an example of a second conditional, which expresses a hypothetical situation in the past with a result that did not happen. The correct form for this type of sentence is "if + subject + had + past participle, subject + would + base verb." In this case, "had known" fits perfectly.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Knew - Incorrect; it should be in the past perfect form.
Option B:
Had known - Correct; matches the second conditional structure.
Option C:
All the above - Incorrect; only "had known" is correct for this sentence.
Option D:
None of the above - Incorrect; "had known" is the right choice.
19.
If she (have) a million dollars, she (fly) to the Moon
A) Has/would fly.
B) Have/would flying.
C) Had/would fly.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence describes an unreal conditional, where the condition is impossible to fulfill in reality ("she has a million dollars"). In such cases, the past tense (had) should be used for the condition and would + base form of verb (would fly) for the result. Option C correctly uses "Had/would fly."
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect because present tense ("has") is not suitable for an unreal conditional.
Option B:
Incorrect because it mixes present tense and gerund form, which does not fit the structure of an unreal conditional.
Option C:
Correct as it uses past tense for the condition and would + base form for the result in an unreal conditional.
Option D:
Incorrect because option C is correct.
20.
In the sentence 'Had I known about the party, I would have attended', what is the subject-verb inversion?
A) I had known.
B) If I had known.
C) Had I known.
D) Known I had.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The subject-verb inversion in the sentence 'Had I known about the party, I would have attended' is correctly identified by Option C: "Had I known." This structure is used to express a past unreal condition and its result. The inversion of the subject "I" with the verb "had known" is essential for forming this type of conditional sentence.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect as it omits the necessary inversion.
Option B:
Incorrect as it uses a conditional clause starting with "if," which is not part of the subject-verb inversion.
Option C:
Correct, as it accurately represents the subject-verb inversion in the sentence.
Option D:
Incorrect as it reverses the order incorrectly.
21.
If I ..... the igredients well, there would be lumps in my cake.
A) Hadn't mixed.
B) Do not mix.
C) Won't mix.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence describes a past unreal condition, where the subject did not mix the ingredients properly, resulting in lumps in the cake. The correct form to express this is "Hadn't mixed," which indicates an action that failed to occur in the past.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. Indicates a past unreal condition where the subject did not mix the ingredients.
Option B:
Incorrect. Uses present tense, which does not fit the context of a past unreal condition.
Option C:
Incorrect. Uses future tense, which is inappropriate for describing an action that failed to occur in the past.
Option D:
Incorrect. There is a correct answer among the options provided.
22.
The workers were too ..... to react on seeing complete strangers entering their area.
A) Sick and tired.
B) Stunned.
C) Desperate.
D) Shattered.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence describes a situation where the workers were taken aback by strangers entering their area, indicating a state of shock or surprise. "Stunned" accurately captures this reaction as it conveys a sudden and intense feeling of being overwhelmed, which fits the context.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
"Sick and tired" suggests fatigue or frustration but does not convey the immediate shock or surprise implied by the scenario.
Option B:
"Stunned" is correct as it describes a state of being shocked or surprised, fitting the context perfectly.
Option C:
"Desperate" implies a sense of urgency or need but does not match the sudden reaction to strangers entering their area.
Option D:
"Shattered" suggests a more severe state of being broken down, which is too extreme for the described situation.
23.
If I were you, I ..... in American money.
A) Wouldn't invest.
B) Would invest.
C) Didn't invest.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence "If I were you, I ..... in American money" is an example of a second conditional, which expresses an unreal situation in the present or future and its result. The correct form for this type of conditional is "would + base verb". Therefore, the correct answer is B) Would invest.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect as it uses "would not" which doesn't fit the structure.
Option B:
Correct as it follows the second conditional structure.
Option C:
Incorrect as it uses "did not" which is in the past tense and doesnβt match the unreal condition.
Option D:
Incorrect as there is a correct answer among the options provided.
24.
If I had known you were in town,
A) I would buy you some flowers!.
B) I would have bought you some flowers.
C) I will buy you some flowers.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option B is correct because it uses the past conditional form "would have" to express a hypothetical situation in the past that did not occur, which aligns with the structure of unreal conditionals. The phrase "If I had known you were in town" sets up a scenario where knowing this information would have led to an action (buying flowers) that was not actually taken.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect; it uses the present conditional form, which is inappropriate for unreal conditionals.
Option B:
Correct; it uses "would have" to indicate a past unreal situation.
Option C:
Incorrect; it uses the future simple tense, which does not fit the context of an unreal conditional.
Option D:
Incorrect; at least one option is correct.
25.
If I (be) more patient, I (study) astrophysics
A) Were/studied.
B) Were/would study.
C) Were/study.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Unreal conditionals express hypothetical situations that are not real and have no chance of happening. In such cases, the past tense is used in the if-clause to indicate a hypothetical situation, while "would" or "used to" is employed in the main clause for the result.
Option B ("Were/would study") correctly uses the past tense "were" in the if-clause and "would" in the main clause to express an unreal condition.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect. Uses simple past instead of would for the result.
Option B:
Correct. Uses were for the hypothetical situation and would for the result.
Option C:
Incorrect. Missing "would" in the main clause.
Option D:
Incorrect. No correct option.
26.
The second conditional is used if there is ..... that the condition will happen.
A) No possibility.
B) Little real possibility.
C) A real possibility.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The second conditional is used to talk about situations that are unlikely or impossible in the present, often involving hypothetical conditions with a result that is also unlikely. Therefore, "B) Little real possibility" correctly describes when the second conditional should be used.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
No possibility - Incorrect; the second conditional can still be used for situations that are not possible but have some remote chance.
Option B:
Little real possibility - Correct; this describes the context where the condition is highly unlikely to happen in reality, making it suitable for using the second conditional.
Option C:
A real possibility - Incorrect; this would be more appropriate for the first conditional, which deals with present or possible conditions.
Option D:
None of the above - Incorrect; option B is correct.
27.
I'm sure you ..... dancing if you came to the class with me.
A) Enjoyed.
B) Would enjoy.
C) All the above.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Unreal conditionals express situations that are hypothetical, impossible, or contrary to fact. In this sentence, the speaker is expressing a future situation (coming to a class) and its result (enjoying dancing), which is not currently true but is being considered hypothetically.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
"Enjoyed" refers to past enjoyment, which does not fit the context of a hypothetical future situation.
Option B:
"Would enjoy" correctly expresses a hypothetical future action and its result, fitting the structure of an unreal conditional sentence.
Option C:
"All the above" is incorrect because only one option fits the context of an unreal conditional.
Option D:
"None of the above" is incorrect as Option B correctly fits the context.
28.
My nephew was absolutely ..... to go with us to an amusement park.
A) Astonished.
B) Excited.
C) Shattered.
D) Thrilled.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The word "thrilled" is the most appropriate choice as it conveys a strong feeling of excitement, which aligns with the context of going to an amusement park. The phrase "absolutely thrilled" emphasizes the intensity of the positive emotion felt by your nephew.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Astonished means surprised or shocked, not necessarily excited about a fun activity like an amusement park.
Option B:
Excited is close but "thrilled" better captures the intensity of feeling for such an event.
Option C:
Shattered means broken or destroyed, which does not fit the context at all.
Option D:
Thrilled accurately describes a strong sense of excitement and joy about going to an amusement park.
29.
If you ..... a trip to any country, where would you ..... ?
A) Won-go.
B) Would win-go.
C) Win-go.
D) Won-went.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence "If you ..... a trip to any country, where would you ..... ?" is an example of an unreal conditional, which typically uses the past tense in the if-clause and would + base verb in the main clause. The correct form for the first blank should be "won" (as in "if you won"), indicating a hypothetical situation. For the second blank, it should be "go," as in "where would you go?".
Option A) Won-go is correct because it uses the past tense ("won") and the base verb ("go") to form an unreal conditional.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. Uses "won" for if-clause and "go" for main clause.
Option B:
Incorrect. "Would win-go" is not a proper formation of an unreal conditional.
Option C:
Incorrect. "Win-go" lacks the past tense in the if-clause.
Option D:
Incorrect. "Won-went" uses incorrect verb form for main clause.
30.
If they ..... about the risks, they ..... more careful.
A) Knew / would be.
B) Know / will be.
C) Would know / were.
D) Had known / would have been.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The correct answer is
D) Had known / would have been.
This sentence uses a past unreal conditional, which expresses a hypothetical situation in the past and its result. "Had known" (past perfect) sets up the condition, while "would have been" (would + perfect infinitive) indicates the consequence that did not occur.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Uses simple past for both parts; incorrect tense usage.
Option B:
Incorrect use of present tense; should be in past unreal conditional form.
Option C:
Future tense is inappropriate here; should express a hypothetical situation and its result in the past.
Option D:
Correct usage of past perfect for condition and would + perfect infinitive for result.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are unreal conditionals?
Unreal conditionals are used to talk about situations that are imaginary, impossible, or unlikely to happen. They express hypothetical scenarios and their outcomes.
How do you form a Type 2 Unreal Conditional?
A Type 2 Unreal Conditional is formed with 'would + base verb' for the main clause and 'past simple' for the conditional clause. For example, "I would go to the party if I had time."
Can you give an example of a past unreal conditional?
A past unreal conditional uses 'would have + past participle' for the main clause and 'past perfect' for the conditional clause. For instance, "If I had studied harder, I would have passed the exam."
What is the difference between a Type 2 Unreal Conditional and a past unreal conditional?
A Type 2 Unreal Conditional talks about present or future situations, while a Past Unreal Conditional refers to hypothetical situations in the past. Both use 'would' but differ in their time frames.
Why are unreal conditionals important for learning English?
Unreal conditionals help learners express hypothetical situations and improve their ability to communicate about what might have happened or could happen under different circumstances.