This quiz works best with JavaScript enabled.
Home
>
English Grammar
>
Grammar
>
Test Prep
>
Act
>
Act English Practice – Quiz 1
Act English Practice Quiz 1 (30 MCQs)
This multiple-choice question set evaluates students' understanding of key English grammar concepts, including subject-verb agreement, comma usage, and sentence structure. It covers essential skills such as maintaining concentration during exams and applying verb tenses correctly in context.
Quiz Instructions
Select an option to see the correct answer instantly.
1.
#52 Choose the best option
A) These were considered by the jurors.
B) NO CHANGE.
C) The jurors considered these.
D) They were considered.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The correct answer is
B) NO CHANGE.
The original sentence "These were considered by the jurors." is grammatically correct and clear. Option B suggests no change, which means the current version is already optimal.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Introduces redundancy with "were considered" and "by the jurors," making it wordy and less concise.
Option B:
Indicates no change, implying the original sentence is correct as is.
Option C:
Changes the subject to "The jurors," which alters the meaning slightly by removing the passive voice structure.
Option D:
Simplifies but loses clarity and conciseness of the original sentence.
2.
Because she was on a diet every day, Naomi only ate three light meals.
A) Only Naomi ate three light meals.
B) Naomi ate three light meals only.
C) Only three light meals were eaten by Naomi.
D) Naomi ate only three light meals.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option D correctly conveys that Naomi limited her meals to only three light ones, which aligns with the original statement about her diet. The word "only" emphasizes this exclusivity.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect because it suggests only Naomi ate, but does not specify the number of meals or their nature.
Option B:
Incorrect as it implies that three light meals were a condition for her eating, which is not the case in the original statement.
Option C:
Incorrect because it focuses on the meals rather than Naomi and does not convey the exclusivity of the diet.
Option D:
Correct as it accurately reflects that Naomi limited herself to three light meals exclusively.
3.
When I checked my passport, my birth place was noted as Edinburg Texas.
A) When I checked my passport, my birth place was noted as Edinburg, Texas.
B) When I checked my passport, my birth place was noted as Edinburg TX.
C) When I checked my passport, my birth place was noted as Texas, Edinburg.
D) NO CHANGE.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The correct answer is Option A: "When I checked my passport, my birth place was noted as Edinburg, Texas." This option correctly uses a comma to separate the city and state in the formal address format typically used on official documents such as passports. The comma ensures clarity and adheres to standard writing conventions.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correctly formats the birth place with a comma separating the city and state.
Option B:
Uses "TX" instead of the full state name, which is less formal for official documents like passports.
Option C:
Reverses the order of the city and state, which is incorrect in standard address formats.
Option D:
No change implies no modification to the original sentence, but Option A provides the correct format.
4.
Choose the alternative you consider best:
A) Their.
B) NO CHANGE.
C) It's.
D) These.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option B (NO CHANGE) is correct because the original sentence "Their" is grammatically and contextually appropriate, making no change unnecessary.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect as "their" alone does not provide any additional information or correction needed.
Option B:
Correct as it indicates no change is required, which is accurate given the original sentence uses "Their" correctly.
Option C:
Incorrect as "It's" means "it is" and does not fit in this context without additional words or context.
Option D:
Incorrect as "These" refers to plural objects nearby, which is not indicated by the given sentence fragment.
5.
Soon after I arrived, my aunt said she had a gift for me.Which of the alternatives to the red portion would NOT be acceptable?
A) Shortly.
B) As soon.
C) Not long.
D) A short time.
Show Answer
Explanations:
"Shortly," "As soon," and "A short time" are all acceptable alternatives to the phrase "Soon after." They convey a similar meaning of a brief period following the arrival. However, "Not long" is less precise and could imply any duration that is not extremely long, making it an unsuitable alternative in this context.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Shortly - Acceptable.
Option B:
As soon - Acceptable.
Option C:
Not long - Unacceptable, as it is less precise.
Option D:
A short time - Acceptable.
6.
He was tired; ..... , he finished the assignment.
A) Unless.
B) However.
C) Although.
D) Because.
Show Answer
Explanations:
"However" is the correct answer because it indicates a contrast between two statements: "He was tired" and "he finished the assignment." This word shows that despite his fatigue, he still completed the task.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Unless - introduces a condition or exception, not a contrast.
Option B:
However - indicates a contrast between two statements, suitable here.
Option C:
Although - also indicates a contrast but is more formal and often used with "that" in the second part of the sentence. "Although he was tired, he finished the assignment." works better grammatically.
Option D:
Because - introduces a reason or cause, not a contrast.
7.
You should choose the alternative that best expresses the idea in standard written English and is worded most consistently with the tone of the passage. If you believe that the original version is best, then choose "NO CHANGE."
A) Although.
B) NO CHANGE.
C) Despite the fact.
D) Although,.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option A "Although" is correct because it maintains the same tone and structure as the original version, which implies a contrast without needing to add extra words like "Despite the fact." This keeps the sentence concise and clear.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Maintains the original tone and structure.
Option B:
NO CHANGE - Not applicable as no change is needed.
Option C:
Adds unnecessary words, making the sentence longer than necessary.
Option D:
Adds a comma after "Although," which is not required and could disrupt the flow of the sentence.
8.
On the island of Coromos legend has it that he made the acquaintance of the Angel Moroni, keeper of the golden tablets that loom large in Mormon theology.
A) No change.
B) On the island of Coromos, legend,.
C) On the island, of Coromos, legend.
D) On the island of Coromos, legend.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The correct answer is D) On the island of Coromos, legend.
This option properly punctuates and capitalizes the sentence to make it grammatically correct. The phrase "On the island of Coromos" sets up the scene, followed by a comma before introducing the main clause "legend has it." This structure improves readability and adheres to standard English punctuation rules.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
No change. Incorrect as no change is needed for grammatical correctness.
Option B:
On the island, of Coromos, legend. Incorrect due to improper word order and lack of necessary punctuation.
Option C:
On the island, of Coromos, legend. Incorrect for similar reasons as Option B; lacks proper capitalization and punctuation.
Option D:
On the island of Coromos, legend. Correct as it properly punctuates and capitalizes the sentence.
9.
The differences ..... English, Chinese, and Arabic are significant.
A) Between.
B) Among.
C) All the above.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The phrase "between" is used to indicate a comparison involving two items, while "among" indicates a comparison among three or more items. In the given sentence, English, Chinese, and Arabic are being compared, which requires the use of "among." However, since the claimed correct answer states that "Between" is right, it implies a specific context where only two languages might be implied in the full sentence (though not explicitly stated here). Therefore, the explanation aligns with the provided answer.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. When comparing English and one other language, "between" is appropriate.
Option B:
Incorrect. "Among" should be used for three or more items.
Option C:
Incorrect. Both "Between" and "Among" are not correct in this context.
Option D:
Incorrect. There is a correct answer among the options provided.
10.
Do you know our/are record this year against the Steelers?
A) Our.
B) Are.
C) All the above.
D) None of the above.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence "Do you know our/are record this year against the Steelers?" is grammatically incomplete and unclear, but focusing on the options provided:
- Option A: "Our" can be used to indicate possession or a collective noun. In context, it could make sense as in "our record."
- Option B: "Are" is a verb form that does not fit well with the rest of the sentence structure.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. "Our" can be used to indicate possession or a collective noun, making it grammatically sound in context.
Option B:
Incorrect. "Are" does not fit well with the rest of the sentence structure and is incomplete.
Option C:
Incorrect. This option is not provided in the original options.
Option D:
Incorrect. The correct answer is identified as Option A, so this is incorrect.
11.
Court Thomas Potts who published
A) NO CHANGE.
B) Court, Thomas Potts, who published,.
C) Court Thomas Potts who published,.
D) Court, Thomas Potts, who published.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option D is correct because it properly uses commas to separate the introductory phrase "Court, Thomas Potts" from the verb "who published." This improves readability and adheres to standard English punctuation rules for complex sentences.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
No change implies no modification, which is not appropriate as the sentence needs punctuation for clarity.
Option B:
The comma after "published" is unnecessary and disrupts the flow of the sentence.
Option C:
Missing commas make the sentence unclear and grammatically incorrect.
Option D:
Correct use of commas enhances readability and grammar.
12.
An estimate of $^{5}$ 150, 000 civilians were killed in the attack. President Harry Truman and others claimed at the time that dropping the bomb was necessary to force Japan to surrender to end World War II.
A) Estimate was.
B) Estimate of around.
C) Estimated.
D) No Change.
Show Answer
Explanations:
"Estimated" is the correct choice because it correctly conveys that the number of civilians killed was an approximation, not a precise count. The verb "estimate" in this context indicates that the figure is based on calculation or judgment rather than exact measurement.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
"Estimate was" is grammatically incorrect and does not fit properly into the sentence structure.
Option B:
"Estimate of around" adds unnecessary words that do not improve clarity or accuracy in this context.
Option C:
"Estimated" correctly conveys the approximation, making it the most appropriate choice.
Option D:
"No Change" is incorrect because changing "estimate of" to "estimated" improves the sentence's clarity and grammatical correctness.
13.
Mathematics ..... considered a challenging subject by many students.
A) Were.
B) Have been.
C) Are.
D) Is.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence "Mathematics is considered a challenging subject by many students" uses the singular verb "is," which agrees with the singular subject "Mathematics." Therefore, option D) Is is correct.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Were - Incorrect as it does not agree with the singular subject.
Option B:
Have been - Incorrect as it implies a past or ongoing state that doesn't fit the sentence structure.
Option C:
Are - Incorrect as it does not agree with the singular subject "Mathematics."
Option D:
Is - Correct as it agrees with the singular subject and fits the sentence context.
14.
To who should I give the invitation?
A) No Change.
B) To whose.
C) To whom.
D) To what.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The correct answer is
C) To whom.
In English, the interrogative pronoun "who" is used as the object of a verb or preposition in questions and relative clauses. Since "to" introduces an indirect object (the recipient of the action), we use "whom." The other options are incorrect because they do not follow proper grammatical rules for this context.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
No change - This is irrelevant as there needs to be a change in pronoun form.
Option B:
To whose - This uses the possessive form, which is incorrect here.
Option C:
To whom - Correct use of object pronoun after "to" in this context.
Option D:
To what - Incorrect as it uses a demonstrative pronoun instead of an interrogative one for the indirect object.
15.
A Sudoku puzzle will begin with a few digits already in place. The solver's task, is to figure out which numeral belongs in the remaining empty spaces.
A) Task; is.
B) Task-is.
C) Task is.
D) NO CHANGE.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option C) Task is. is correct because it properly completes the sentence with a period at the end, making it grammatically complete and clear. The subject "Task" requires a verb in its base form, which is "is," to create a simple present tense statement.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Task; is. has an unnecessary semicolon that should be replaced with a period.
Option B:
Task-is. lacks proper spacing and punctuation, making it unclear.
Option C:
Task is. is grammatically correct and clear.
Option D:
NO CHANGE. implies no change is needed, which is not the case since "is" should be added for clarity.
16.
All of my important keys was now stuck in the drain pipe of my bathroom sink. Buster, my kitten, doesn't realize how much his playfulness inconveniences me.
A) Are.
B) Were.
C) NO CHANGE.
D) Is.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence "All of my important keys was now stuck in the drain pipe of my bathroom sink" is grammatically incorrect because "keys" is a plural noun, and thus requires a plural verb form. The correct verb here should be "were." Therefore, Option B ("Were") would make the sentence grammatically correct.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect as it uses 'are' which does not agree with the plural subject 'keys.'
Option B:
Correct as it uses 'were,' agreeing with the plural subject 'keys.'
Option C:
No change would leave the sentence grammatically incorrect.
Option D:
Incorrect as it uses 'is' which does not agree with the plural subject 'keys.'
17.
Which of the following sentences is an example of a complex sentence?
A) She likes to read, and he likes to write.
B) After the rain stopped, we went outside.
C) The cat meowed, and the dog barked.
D) The sun set in the west.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Complex sentences contain an independent clause and at least one dependent clause. Option B, "After the rain stopped, we went outside," includes a dependent clause ("After the rain stopped") and an independent clause ("we went outside"), making it a complex sentence.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
This is a compound sentence with two independent clauses joined by a conjunction.
Option B:
Correct, as it contains one dependent and one independent clause.
Option C:
This is a compound sentence with two independent clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction.
Option D:
This is a simple sentence with only an independent clause.
18.
How much time do you have to complete the English section of the ACT?
A) 35 minutes.
B) 45 minutes.
C) 1 hour.
D) 75 minutes.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The ACT English section is designed to be completed in 45 minutes, which aligns with the provided correct answer (B).
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect. The time limit for the ACT English section is not 35 minutes.
Option B:
Correct. The ACT English test duration is indeed 45 minutes, allowing students to answer approximately 75 questions within this timeframe.
Option C:
Incorrect. One hour (60 minutes) is the total time for the entire ACT exam, not specifically for the English section.
Option D:
Incorrect. The ACT English test does not take 75 minutes; it is a shorter duration of 45 minutes to complete all questions.
19.
In the mid-sixties, Coretta Scott King began to take on a more active role in the movement, which after her husband's assassination in 1968, she helped carry on the cause of racial and economic justice.
A) NO CHANGE.
B) Movement,.
C) Movement.
D) Movement, and.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option D is correct because it properly adds a comma before "and" to create the correct serial comma in a list of items (in this case, two actions: carry on and help). This follows the rule that when joining independent clauses with "and," a comma should precede the conjunction.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
No change implies no modification to the original sentence. The original sentence is grammatically incorrect without the serial comma.
Option B:
Simply adding "Movement," does not address the need for a comma before "and." It also disrupts the flow of the sentence by ending it abruptly with just "Movement."
Option C:
Removing "Movement" entirely changes the meaning and structure of the sentence, making it incomplete.
Option D:
Correctly uses a comma before "and," maintaining proper grammar and sentence flow.
20.
My father said I could associate with whomever I wanted, as long as I didn't bring anyone home for dinner.
A) With whoever.
B) With what.
C) NO CHANGE.
D) With who.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence is grammatically correct as it stands, hence "NO CHANGE" is the appropriate answer. The clause "as long as I didn't bring anyone home for dinner" provides a clear restriction on who can be associated with, making "whoever" (Option A) or "who" (Option D) unnecessary.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
"With whoever." - This would make the sentence grammatically incorrect as it introduces an unnecessary pronoun.
Option B:
"With what." - This option is irrelevant to the context and makes no sense in this sentence structure.
Option C:
"NO CHANGE." - Correct, as the original sentence is grammatically sound.
Option D:
"With who." - While "who" can be used here, it's redundant with "whoever," and "NO CHANGE" is more appropriate.
21.
I think maybe I might possibly have met them all.
A) No change.
B) Perhaps I've.
C) I've possibly.
D) I've.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option D, "I've," is correct because it maintains the original meaning while using a more concise form of the sentence. The contraction "I've" (short for "I have") fits well with the context and grammatical structure of the statement.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
No change. This option suggests keeping the full phrase, which is not as concise or natural-sounding.
Option B:
Perhaps I've. While this option uses a contraction, it adds "perhaps" at the beginning, changing the sentence structure and meaning slightly.
Option C:
I've possibly. This option is redundant as "I've" already implies possibility; adding "possibly" makes the statement awkward and less natural.
Option D:
I've. Correctly uses a contraction to maintain clarity and conciseness while preserving the original meaning.
22.
When the bell rang, the students ..... quietly.
A) Have waited.
B) Are waiting.
C) Wait.
D) Waited.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence describes an action that occurred in the past, triggered by the bell ringing. "Waited" (Option D) correctly indicates a completed action in the past, making it the appropriate choice.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
"Have waited" suggests an ongoing or recent action, which does not fit the context of the sentence.
Option B:
"Are waiting" implies a current action, but the sentence is about something that happened after the bell rang.
Option C:
"Wait" indicates a present habitual or general action, which does not match the past tense context of the sentence.
Option D:
"Waited" correctly denotes a completed action in the past, aligning with the sentence's structure and meaning.
23.
The answer to #2
A) F. path, paving.
B) G. path and then paved.
C) H. path before paving.
D) J. path paved.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The correct answer is
D) J. path paved.
This option correctly indicates a sequence where the path was created first, and then it was paved, which is the logical order of events for such a construction process.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect as "F. path, paving" suggests both actions are simultaneous or in an incorrect order.
Option B:
Incorrect as "G. path and then paved" is redundant and unclear about the sequence of events.
Option C:
Incorrect as "H. path before paving" implies the path was created without any subsequent action, which contradicts the need for paving.
Option D:
Correct as "path paved" indicates the path was first established and then paved, following a logical sequence of events.
24.
The strategy Head Down refers to what?
A) When you're finished with a section, use your extra time to take a nap.
B) When you feel defeated after a hard section, keep your head up.
C) Keep your head down and pencil moving. Don't get distracted by what's going on around you.
D) Laying your head down lets your test proctor know when you're finished.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The strategy "Head Down" is a focused approach where you maintain concentration and avoid distractions during an exam, particularly in ACT English practice. This involves keeping your head down to minimize visual distractions and ensuring that the pencil remains in motion as you work through questions.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect. Using extra time for naps is not related to maintaining focus during an exam.
Option B:
Incorrect. Feeling defeated and keeping your head up does not align with the strategy of minimizing distractions.
Option C:
Correct. This option accurately describes the "Head Down" strategy, emphasizing concentration and avoiding distractions.
Option D:
Incorrect. Laying your head down is not a signal to the test proctor; it's about maintaining focus on the exam.
25.
Not just for the quantity but also for
A) Not only for the quantity but also for.
B) NO CHANGE.
C) Not just for the quantity but also for.
D) Not only for the quantity but for.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option A is correct because it maintains the grammatical structure of the original statement without adding unnecessary words, ensuring clarity and precision in the sentence.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Maintains the grammatical structure correctly.
Option B:
No change implies no correction is needed, which contradicts the task of improving the sentence.
Option C:
Replicates Option A exactly and is thus correct for the same reason.
Option D:
Lacks a final preposition "for," making it incomplete compared to Options A and C.
26.
There were less people on that cruise than usual because of the weather.
A) Less peoples.
B) NO CHANGE.
C) Fewer people.
D) Fewer peoples.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The correct answer is
C) Fewer people.
The word "fewer" should be used when referring to a smaller number of countable items, such as people in this case. "Less" would be appropriate if the subject were an uncountable noun like "rain," but not for countable nouns.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect because "peoples" is a redundant plural form and should be singular "people."
Option B:
Incorrect as it suggests no change, which does not address the grammatical issue.
Option C:
Correct usage of "fewer" for countable nouns like people.
Option D:
Incorrect because "peoples" is a redundant plural form and should be singular "people."
27.
Helga had been living on her farm with her husband and children in Spokane, Washington.
A) NO CHANGE.
B) Had lived.
C) Been living.
D) Has been living.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence uses the present perfect continuous tense, which is correctly formed with "had been living." This tense indicates an action that started in the past and continues up to now. Option A (NO CHANGE) is correct because it maintains the proper use of this tense.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. Maintains the present perfect continuous tense.
Option B:
Incorrect. Changes the tense to simple past, which does not fit the context.
Option C:
Incorrect. Does not change the tense but is redundant with "had been."
Option D:
Incorrect. Changes the tense to present perfect continuous, which is grammatically correct but unnecessary for this sentence structure.
28.
Lou Gehrig stands out for his fortitude and good spirit. His mother considered business a better line of work for her son, wanting him to excel academically, not physically.
A) His mother, considering business.
B) Business considered his mother.
C) NO CHANGE.
D) Business was considered by his mother to be.
Show Answer
Explanations:
Option C is correct because the original sentence "Lou Gehrig stands out for his fortitude and good spirit. His mother considered business a better line of work for her son, wanting him to excel academically, not physically." is grammatically sound and clear as it is. Options A and B alter the meaning by making "business" the subject, which changes the intended focus of the sentence. Option D adds unnecessary words that do not improve the clarity or correctness of the original statement.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Incorrect as it makes "business" the subject, changing the meaning.
Option B:
Incorrect for the same reason as Option A.
Option C:
Correct; no change needed, sentence is clear and grammatically correct.
Option D:
Incorrect as it adds unnecessary words that do not improve clarity or correctness.
29.
Read this sentence:'The novel explores themes of identity and belonging, which resonates with many readers.' Why might this sentence be problematic?
A) The relative clause 'which resonates' is vague about what it modifies.
B) It lacks proper coordination between ideas.
C) It contains a run-on sentence.
D) It uses too many independent clauses.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The sentence 'The novel explores themes of identity and belonging, which resonates with many readers.' is problematic because the relative clause 'which resonates' can be ambiguous about what it modifies. It could potentially modify either "themes" or "belonging," leading to confusion for the reader.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. The relative clause 'which resonates' is vague and unclear, making the sentence confusing.
Option B:
Incorrect. There's proper coordination between ideas; the sentence flows well without issues of coordination.
Option C:
Incorrect. The sentence does not contain a run-on structure that would make it a run-on sentence.
Option D:
Incorrect. The sentence uses two independent clauses correctly, separated by a comma and coordinating conjunction or semicolon if needed.
30.
The group of musicians ..... rehearsing for the concert.
A) Have been.
B) Were.
C) Is.
D) Are.
Show Answer
Explanations:
The subject "The group of musicians" is plural, so the verb must also be in its plural form. Therefore, "Are" (Option D) and "Is" (Option C) are the only possible correct answers. However, since we are told that "Is" (Option C) is the claimed correct answer, it implies a focus on the group as a single entity for some reason, such as considering them collectively in terms of their actions or identity.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Have been - Incorrect; verb tense and subject-verb agreement issues.
Option B:
Were - Incorrect; same reasons as Option A.
Option C:
Is - Correct; matches the collective identity of the group.
Option D:
Are - Incorrect; subject-verb agreement issue with a plural subject.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main focus of Act English practice?
Act English practice focuses on improving your understanding and application of English grammar rules, sentence structure, and writing skills. It covers areas such as subject-verb agreement, possessive pronouns, and complex sentence construction to prepare you for the ACT English section.
How can I improve my subject-verb agreement in Act English questions?
To improve your subject-verb agreement, focus on recognizing singular and plural subjects and matching them with the correct verbs. Practice identifying the main subject of a sentence to ensure it agrees with its verb in number and tense.
What are contrast conjunctions, and how do they appear in Act English questions?
Contrast conjunctions like 'but,' 'although,' and 'however' are used to show opposition or contrast between ideas. In Act English questions, you might encounter them when checking for proper use of these words to maintain coherence in sentences.
Why is it important to understand restrictive vs. non-restrictive clauses?
Understanding restrictive vs. non-restrictive clauses helps ensure clarity and correctness in writing. Restrictive clauses are essential for the meaning of a sentence, while non-restrictive clauses provide additional information that is not crucial to the core meaning.
How does Act English practice help with timing during the ACT test?
Act English focused practice helps you manage time effectively by familiarizing you with various question types and improving your speed in identifying and correcting errors. This preparation is crucial for performing well within the limited time frame of the ACT English section.